Issue 2, 1999

Comparison of Thermodynamic Hydrogen Bonding, Brönsted and Gas-phase Basicity with Spectroscopic Hydrogen Bonding Basicity of N1,N1-Dimethylformamidines. Similarities and Differences in Substituent Effects

Abstract

Comparison of the thermodynamic (logKHB with 4-fluorophenol in CCl4, pKa in azeotropic ethanol and GB in the gas phase) with spectroscopic basicities (ΔvOH of methanol in CCl4) for N1,N1-dimethylformamidines shows good correlation only between the pKa and ΔvOH values; no general simple linear model can be applied to the logKHBvOH and GB/ΔvOH relations.

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Chem. Res. (S), 1999, 116-117

Comparison of Thermodynamic Hydrogen Bonding, Brönsted and Gas-phase Basicity with Spectroscopic Hydrogen Bonding Basicity of N1,N1-Dimethylformamidines. Similarities and Differences in Substituent Effects

E. D. Raczyńska, J. Chem. Res. (S), 1999, 116 DOI: 10.1039/A805703F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements