Issue 1, 2019

Aromaticity, Coulomb repulsion, π delocalization or strain: who is who in endohedral metallofullerene stability?

Abstract

Endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) synthetized in the laboratory are known to often violate the isolated pentagon and pentagon adjacency penalty rules that successfully describe the relative stability of pristine fullerene isomers. To explain these anomalies, several models have been proposed. In this work, we have systematically investigated the performance of the widely used IPSI (inverse pentagon separation index), ALA (additive local aromaticity) and CSI (charge stabilization index) models in predicting the relative stability of a large number of EMF isomers with cages ranging from C28 to C104 and charge states of 4− and 6−. By explicitly comparing with existing experiments and quantum chemistry calculations, we show that the predictive power of the ALA and CSI models is similarly good, with CSI being slightly superior though computationally much less involved. IPSI's performance is generally worse though still acceptable in a wide range of cage sizes, except for the higher charge states in the C62 to C82 size interval. From our analysis, we conclude that neither Coulomb electronic repulsion (IPSI) nor aromaticity (ALA) are the sole parameters governing the relative stability of EMF isomers. Electron delocalization in the π shell in combination with minimum strain (CSI) provides a more realistic description of the relative stabilities observed experimentally, as the former can compensate an unfavorable Coulomb repulsion and account for stabilizing binding effects that do not necessarily translate into aromaticity.

Graphical abstract: Aromaticity, Coulomb repulsion, π delocalization or strain: who is who in endohedral metallofullerene stability?

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
29 Oct 2018
Accepted
23 Nov 2018
First published
23 Nov 2018

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019,21, 124-131

Aromaticity, Coulomb repulsion, π delocalization or strain: who is who in endohedral metallofullerene stability?

Y. Wang, S. Díaz-Tendero, M. Alcamí and F. Martín, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 124 DOI: 10.1039/C8CP06707D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements