Issue 9, 2012

Dark uncertainty

Abstract

There is now abundant evidence that we analytical chemists are tending to underestimate the uncertainty of our measurements. There are two main underlying reasons for this. One reason is technical: it is easy to overlook important contributions to uncertainty, so the models used to estimate uncertainty may be incomplete. The second reason may be psychological: there may be an unconscious selection bias in the information we use to assess uncertainty. What should we do about this missing, ‘dark’, uncertainty?

Graphical abstract: Dark uncertainty

Article information

Article type
AMC Technical Brief
Submitted
27 Jun 2012
First published
13 Jul 2012

Anal. Methods, 2012,4, 2609-2612

Dark uncertainty

Analytical Methods Committee, AMCTB No 53, Anal. Methods, 2012, 4, 2609 DOI: 10.1039/C2AY90034C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements