Issue 6, 2013

The surface charge of anti-bacterial coatings alters motility and biofilm architecture

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms affect many areas of human activity including food processing, transportation, public infrastructure, and most importantly healthcare. This study addresses the prevention of biofilms and shows that the surface charge of an abiotic substrate influences bacterial motility as well as the morphology and physiology of the biofilm. Grafting-from polymerisation was used to create polymer brush surfaces with different characteristics, and the development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms was followed using confocal microscopy. Interestingly, two types of biofilms developed on these surfaces: mushroom structures with high levels of cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) were found on negatively charged poly (3-sulphopropylmethacrylate) (SPM) and zwitterionic poly (2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl)dimethyl-3-sulphoproyl) ammonium hydroxide) (MEDSAH), while flat biofilms developed on glass, positively charged poly (2-(methacryloyloxy)-ethyl trimethyl ammonium chloride) (METAC), protein-repellent poly oligo(ethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate) (POEGMA) and hydrophobic polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). The results show that of all the surfaces studied, overall the negatively charged polymer brushes were most efficient in reducing bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. However, the increased level of regulatory c-di-GMP in mushroom structures suggests that bacteria are capable of a quick physiological response when exposed to surfaces with varying physicochemical characteristics enabling some bacterial colonization also on negatively charged surfaces.

Graphical abstract: The surface charge of anti-bacterial coatings alters motility and biofilm architecture

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
21 Dec 2012
Accepted
15 Feb 2013
First published
04 Mar 2013
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Biomater. Sci., 2013,1, 589-602

The surface charge of anti-bacterial coatings alters motility and biofilm architecture

O. Rzhepishevska, S. Hakobyan, R. Ruhal, J. Gautrot, D. Barbero and M. Ramstedt, Biomater. Sci., 2013, 1, 589 DOI: 10.1039/C3BM00197K

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements