Issue 9, 2014

Gas–liquid–liquid three-phase flow pattern and pressure drop in a microfluidic chip: similarities with gas–liquid/liquid–liquid flows

Abstract

We report a three-phase slug flow and a parallel-slug flow as two major flow patterns found under the nitrogen–decane–water flow through a glass microfluidic chip which features a long microchannel with a hydraulic diameter of 98 μm connected to a cross-flow mixer. The three-phase slug flow pattern is characterized by a flow of decane droplets containing single elongated nitrogen bubbles, which are separated by water slugs. This flow pattern was observed at a superficial velocity of decane (in the range of about 0.6 to 10 mm s−1) typically lower than that of water for a given superficial gas velocity in the range of 30 to 91 mm s−1. The parallel-slug flow pattern is characterized by a continuous water flow in one part of the channel cross section and a parallel flow of decane with dispersed nitrogen bubbles in the adjacent part of the channel cross section, which was observed at a superficial velocity of decane (in the range of about 2.5 to 40 mm s−1) typically higher than that of water for each given superficial gas velocity. The three-phase slug flow can be seen as a superimposition of both decane–water and nitrogen–decane slug flows observed in the chip when the flow of the third phase (viz. nitrogen or water, respectively) was set at zero. The parallel-slug flow can be seen as a superimposition of the decane–water parallel flow and the nitrogen–decane slug flow observed in the chip under the corresponding two-phase flow conditions. In case of small capillary numbers (Ca ≪ 0.1) and Weber numbers (We ≪ 1), the developed two-phase pressure drop model under a slug flow has been extended to obtain a three-phase slug flow model in which the ‘nitrogen-in-decane’ droplet is assumed as a pseudo-homogeneous droplet with an effective viscosity. The parallel flow and slug flow pressure drop models have been combined to obtain a parallel-slug flow model. The obtained models describe the experimental pressure drop with standard deviations of 8% and 12% for the three-phase slug flow and parallel-slug flow, respectively. An example is given to illustrate the model uses in designing bifurcated microchannels that split the three-phase slug flow for high-throughput processing.

Graphical abstract: Gas–liquid–liquid three-phase flow pattern and pressure drop in a microfluidic chip: similarities with gas–liquid/liquid–liquid flows

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
26 Nov 2013
Accepted
10 Feb 2014
First published
12 Feb 2014

Lab Chip, 2014,14, 1632-1649

Gas–liquid–liquid three-phase flow pattern and pressure drop in a microfluidic chip: similarities with gas–liquid/liquid–liquid flows

J. Yue, E. V. Rebrov and J. C. Schouten, Lab Chip, 2014, 14, 1632 DOI: 10.1039/C3LC51307F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements