Issue 33, 2023

The reference electrode dilemma in energy conversion electrocatalysis: “right vs. okay vs. wrong”

Abstract

In this study, to show the extent to which the use of any reference electrode (RE) at any pH could affect the electrochemical data, Hg/HgO, 1.0 M KOH (MMO, Eref = 98 mV), Hg/Hg2SO4, sat. K2SO4 (MMS, Eref = 640 mV), Ag/AgCl, 3.0 M NaCl (SSC, Eref = 210 mV), and Hg/Hg2Cl2, sat. KCl (SCE, Eref = 241 mV) standard REs destined for use in alkaline, acidic, and neutral waters, respectively, are taken to monitor the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) onset potential of Pt in 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH, and 1.0 M PBS (phosphate buffer solution). The standard potential of the reference electrode can be calculated using the Nernst equation since the HER onset of Pt is known against the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) (i.e., 0.0 V vs. RHE). Any change that one might see with the HER onset of Pt while using an inappropriate RE at an inappropriate pH could be attributed to the pH gradient between the RE compartment and the cell. Our results revealed that when an inappropriate RE was used at an inappropriate pH, the standard potential of the RE was shifted either negatively or positively depending on the combination of RE and pH. This shift ranged from +78 mV to −74 mV at their maxima and this is highly significant when we consider the overpotential ranges reported with familiar energy conversion reactions such as the HER, oxygen evolution, oxygen reduction, CO2 reduction, etc. Hence, it is strongly recommended to use an appropriate RE for a given pH considering its pH-compatibility and the harm that it will otherwise do to the analysis and the results thereof.

Graphical abstract: The reference electrode dilemma in energy conversion electrocatalysis: “right vs. okay vs. wrong”

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
28 May 2023
Accepted
24 Jul 2023
First published
24 Jul 2023

J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023,11, 17699-17709

The reference electrode dilemma in energy conversion electrocatalysis: “right vs. okay vs. wrong”

S. Anantharaj, P. J. J. Sagayaraj, M. S. Yesupatham, R. Arulraj, K. Eswaran, K. Sekar and S. Noda, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11, 17699 DOI: 10.1039/D3TA03145D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements