Issue 2, 2009

Field evaluation of thermal and chemical desorption BTEX radial diffusive sampler radiello® compared with active (pumped) samplers for ambient air measurements

Abstract

The performance of two types of radiello® diffusive samplers, filled with a thermally desorbable adsorbent (graphitised carbon Carbograph 4™) and with a solvent desorbable adsorbent (activated charcoal), respectively, have been evaluated for the monitoring of BTEX in ambient air, by comparison with active (pumped) samplers. A two year survey was carried out in Padua, a medium-sized town, in a traffic site, close to a busy crossroad. The concentrations of BTEX were measured for 15 campaigns, during which four series of radial diffusive samplers were exposed for 2 day, 7 day, 10 day and 14 day time periods, respectively. Every series of chemical desorption samplers included three replicates; thermal desorption samplers included six replicates, three of them filled with freshly conditioned cartridges and three filled with regenerated cartridges. No significant difference in the levels measured either by new or by regenerated cartridges has been found. During three campaigns (summer 2004, winter and spring 2005) two active (pumped) samplers were added for each sampling period. The diffusive uptake rates have been calculated and modelled under various conditions of concentration, temperature and exposure time. The effects of the environmental factors on the performances of both solvent and thermally desorbable samplers have been evaluated. The repeatability of the whole measurement process (sampling and analysis) was calculated for every sampling duration. The comparison of concentration levels measured by diffusive and active sampling methods shows correlation coefficients R ≥ 0.98 (p < 0.01) for all the compounds. The uncertainty of the diffusive sampling method under field conditions, using active sampling as the reference method, has been assessed according to the ISO 13752 requirements. On field relative expanded uncertainty for benzene has been found below 20%.

Graphical abstract: Field evaluation of thermal and chemical desorption BTEX radial diffusive sampler radiello® compared with active (pumped) samplers for ambient air measurements

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
22 Aug 2008
Accepted
24 Nov 2008
First published
10 Dec 2008

J. Environ. Monit., 2009,11, 297-306

Field evaluation of thermal and chemical desorption BTEX radial diffusive sampler radiello® compared with active (pumped) samplers for ambient air measurements

C. Cocheo, C. Boaretto, D. Pagani, F. Quaglio, P. Sacco, L. Zaratin and D. Cottica, J. Environ. Monit., 2009, 11, 297 DOI: 10.1039/B814629B

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements