Issue 12, 2010

Structural relationships between o-, m- and p-tolyl substituted R3EI2 (E = As, P) and [(R3E)AuX] (E = As, P; X = Cl, Br, I)

Abstract

The compounds R3EI2 (R = o-tolyl, E = As, 1a; R = m-tolyl, E = P 1c; R = p-tolyl, E = As, 1d, P, 1e), which display the charge transfer spoke structure, and [(o-tolyl3As)AuCl] 2 have been synthesised and their solid state structures compared to the related complexes [(R3P)AuX] (R = o-tolyl, X = Cl, I, Ia; Br, II; I, III; R = m-tolyl, X = Cl, IV; R = p-tolyl, X = Cl, V, Va; Br, VI; I, VII) on the basis of a similarity of their molecular shape and volume. All of the new compounds 1a, 1c–1e and 2 have been fully spectroscopically characterised and by single crystal X-ray crystallography. The sterically demanding exo3o-tolyl ring conformation is observed for 1a, which is comparable to that reported for o-tolyl3PI21b, with a long As–I bond 2.7351(14) Å and short I⋯I distance 2.9528(11) Å. The exo3o-tolyl ring conformation is maintained on complexation to gold(I) in 2, but has no significant impact on the expected bond lengths, with As–Au 2.3443(15) Å and Au–Cl 2.284(4) Å. The exo3 conformation appears to be stabilised in both cases by the formation of a six-fold edge-to-face (EF)6 embrace. It is found that in some cases the structures of the dihalogen adducts and the gold(I) complexes are isomorphous indicating that ligand packing requirements are most significant i.e. for 1c and IV. Where the structures digress this is due either to the greater ability of the dihalogen adduct to engage in hydrogen bonding 1a, b and I–III; or subtle changes in the nature of the tolyl ring embraces 1d, e and V–VII. Subtle changes in the nature of the tolyl ring embraces also account for the different polymorphs I and Ia and V and Va. There is no credible evidence to suggest that the aurophilic contact, seen in only one polymorph Va, exerts any influence on the overall crystal packing. The structural comparisons presented here add further to the applicability of the recently recognised structural mimicking ability of the R3PX2 systems and [R3PAuX] complexes, and that the aurophilic contact is a poor supramolecular synthon.

Graphical abstract: Structural relationships between o-, m- and p-tolyl substituted R3EI2 (E = As, P) and [(R3E)AuX] (E = As, P; X = Cl, Br, I)

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
23 Mar 2010
Accepted
09 Jul 2010
First published
03 Aug 2010

CrystEngComm, 2010,12, 4240-4251

Structural relationships between o-, m- and p-tolyl substituted R3EI2 (E = As, P) and [(R3E)AuX] (E = As, P; X = Cl, Br, I)

N. A. Barnes, K. R. Flower, S. M. Godfrey, P. A. Hurst, R. Z. Khan and R. G. Pritchard, CrystEngComm, 2010, 12, 4240 DOI: 10.1039/C0CE00024H

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements