Issue 7, 2012

Different ionic liquids favor different lignocellulosic biomass particle sizes during pretreatment to function efficiently

Abstract

Cotton stalks at four different particles sizes (<0.15 mm, 0.15–0.5 mm, 0.5–1.0 mm and 1.0–2.0 mm) were subjected to ionic liquid pretreatment via 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (EMIMAc) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIMCl) followed by the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass. The changes in crystalline structure, lignin content and digestibility of the pretreated samples were investigated in addition to the glucose yield obtained from cotton stalks. For EMIMAc pretreatment, the lowest glucose yield (57%) was obtained upon the pretreatment of cotton stalks having the smallest particle size prior to pretreatment (<0.15 mm) while cotton stalks with larger particle sizes gave higher glucose yields of which were at least 71%. On the contrary, EMIMCl pretreatment functioned more efficiently with cotton stalks having smaller particle sizes (<0.15 mm and 0.15–0.5 mm) where increasing the biomass particle size further caused a decrease in the glucose yield from approximately 49% to 33%, unlike the EMIMAc pretreatment. These differences in the glucose yields obtained for different ionic liquids suggest that the ideal particle size of biomass prior to pretreatment may change from one ionic liquid to another.

Graphical abstract: Different ionic liquids favor different lignocellulosic biomass particle sizes during pretreatment to function efficiently

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
05 Mar 2012
Accepted
24 Apr 2012
First published
25 Apr 2012

Green Chem., 2012,14, 1896-1903

Different ionic liquids favor different lignocellulosic biomass particle sizes during pretreatment to function efficiently

E. Bahcegul, S. Apaydin, N. I. Haykir, E. Tatli and U. Bakir, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 1896 DOI: 10.1039/C2GC35318K

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements