Issue 38, 2014

New understanding of the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2

Abstract

In general, anatase TiO2 exhibits higher photocatalytic activities than rutile TiO2. However, the reasons for the differences in photocatalytic activity between anatase and rutile are still being debated. In this work, the band structure, density of states, and effective mass of photogenerated charge carriers for anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2 are investigated by the first-principle density functional theory calculation. The results indicate that anatase appears to be an indirect band gap semiconductor, while rutile and brookite belong to the direct band gap semiconductor category. Indirect band gap anatase exhibits a longer lifetime of photoexcited electrons and holes than direct band gap rutile and brookite because the direct transitions of photogenerated electrons from the conduction band (CB) to valence band (VB) of anatase TiO2 is impossible. Furthermore, anatase has the lightest average effective mass of photogenerated electrons and holes as compared to rutile and brookite. The lightest effective mass suggests the fastest migration of photogenerated electrons and holes from the interior to surface of anatase TiO2 particle, thus resulting in the lowest recombination rate of photogenerated charge carriers within anatase TiO2. Therefore, it is not surprising that anatase usually shows a higher photocatalytic activity than rutile and brookite. This investigation will provide some new insight into understanding the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite.

Graphical abstract: New understanding of the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2

Article information

Article type
Communication
Submitted
20 May 2014
Accepted
05 Aug 2014
First published
05 Aug 2014

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014,16, 20382-20386

New understanding of the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2

J. Zhang, P. Zhou, J. Liu and J. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 20382 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP02201G

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements