Issue 38, 2016

Complexes of Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) with small peptides: deciding whether to deprotonate

Abstract

The observed variety of metal-ion complexation sites offered by peptides reflects a basic tension between charge solvation of the ion by Lewis-basic chelating groups versus amide nitrogen deprotonation and formation of metal–nitrogen bonds. Gas-phase models of metal-ion coordination can illuminate the factors governing this choice in condensed-phase proteins and enzymes. Here, structures of gas-phase complexes of Ni(II) and Cu(II) with tri- and tetra-peptide ligands are mapped out using a combination of Infrared Multiple Photon Dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) computations. The two binding modes give distinctive IRMPD signatures, particularly in the diagnostic region 1500–1550 cm−1. Previous observations have suggested that Ni(II) complexes preferentially show the iminol rearrangement pattern (Im) giving low-spin square-planar geometries with metal-ion bonds to deprotonated amide nitrogens. In contrast, alkaline earth metal ion complexes prefer amide carbonyl oxygens chelating the metal ion with pyramidal geometry (charge-solvation, CS). Surprisingly, it is shown here that the Gly4 complexes are CS bound, in contrast with the expectation of Im binding. It is suggested that CS binding is actually a normal Ni(II) and Cu(II) binding mode to simple peptides lacking participating side chains. Three factors are suggested to influence the choice between CS and Im binding patterns: (1) presence of an accessible side-chain Lewis-basic proton interaction site (FGGF, FGG and HAA complexes); (2) short chain length of the peptide leading to a shortage of accessible carbonyl oxygen sites for CS binding, (AAA, FGG and HAA complexes); (3) outright deprotonation of the ligand giving net negatively charged Im[Ni2+(Gly4–3H+)] and Im[Ni2+(Ala3–3H+)] complexes, which have a triply-deprotonated ligand. IRMPD spectra of [Cu2+Gly4]2+ and [Cu2+(Gly4–3H+)] complexes suggest that their structures are similar to their Ni2+ analogs.

Graphical abstract: Complexes of Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) with small peptides: deciding whether to deprotonate

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
07 Jun 2016
Accepted
08 Sep 2016
First published
09 Sep 2016

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016,18, 26923-26932

Complexes of Ni(II) and Cu(II) with small peptides: deciding whether to deprotonate

R. C. Dunbar, J. Martens, G. Berden and J. Oomens, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 26923 DOI: 10.1039/C6CP03974J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements