Issue 2, 1993

Radiation versus conduction in heated spray chamber desolvation for inductively coupled plasmas

Abstract

A comparative study has been made of the performance of two heated spray chamber desolvation systems for sample introduction into inductively coupled plasmas. These two systems differed in the way that heat was delivered to the aerosol. The first system used a silica spray chamber that was embedded in an electrically heated copper block, so that conductive heat transfer was favoured. The second system used a spray chamber of the same dimensions and material, but it was placed at the focus of a radiant heater. Measurements were made of the sensitivity gains, stabilities and sample carryover that were obtained with both systems when aqueous solutions were injected using several different nebulizers. The results showed that radiant heating gave better short-term stability and sharply reduced wash-out times and carryover effects.

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1993,8, 305-308

Radiation versus conduction in heated spray chamber desolvation for inductively coupled plasmas

A. R. Eastgate, R. C. Fry and G. H. Gower, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1993, 8, 305 DOI: 10.1039/JA9930800305

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements