5ET2

Lambda-Ru(TAP)2(dppz)]2+ bound to d(TTGGCGCCAA)

  • Classification: DNA
  • Organism(s): synthetic construct
  • Mutation(s): No 

  • Deposited: 2015-11-17 Released: 2016-11-23 
  • Deposition Author(s): Hall, J.P., Cardin, C.J.
  • Funding Organization(s): Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.39 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.185 
  • R-Value Work: 0.166 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.167 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Inosine Can Increase DNA's Susceptibility to Photo-oxidation by a Ru(II) Complex due to Structural Change in the Minor Groove.

Keane, P.M.Hall, J.P.Poynton, F.E.Poulsen, B.C.Gurung, S.P.Clark, I.P.Sazanovich, I.V.Towrie, M.Gunnlaugsson, T.Quinn, S.J.Cardin, C.J.Kelly, J.M.

(2017) Chemistry 23: 10344-10351

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201701447
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    4QIO, 5ET2

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Key to the development of DNA-targeting phototherapeutic drugs is determining the interplay between the photoactivity of the drug and its binding preference for a target sequence. For the photo-oxidising lambda-[Ru(TAP) 2 (dppz)] 2+ (Λ-1) (dppz=dipyridophenazine) complex bound to either d{T 1 C 2 G 3 G 4 C 5 G 6 C 7 C 8 G 9 A 10 } 2 (G9) or d{TCGGCGCCIA} 2 (I9), the X-ray crystal structures show the dppz intercalated at the terminal T 1 C 2 ;G 9 A 10 step or T 1 C 2 ;I 9 A 10 step. Thus substitution of the G 9 nucleobase by inosine does not affect intercalation in the solid state although with I9 the dppz is more deeply inserted. In solution it is found that the extent of guanine photo-oxidation, and the rate of back electron-transfer, as determined by pico- and nanosecond time-resolved infrared and transient visible absorption spectroscopy, is enhanced in I9, despite it containing the less oxidisable inosine. This is attributed to the nature of the binding in the minor groove due to the absence of an NH 2 group. Similar behaviour and the same binding site in the crystal are found for d{TTGGCGCCAA} 2 (A9). In solution, we propose that intercalation occurs at the C 2 G 3 ;C 8 I 9 or T 2 G 3 ;C 8 A 9 steps, respectively, with G 3 the likely target for photo-oxidation. This demonstrates how changes in the minor groove (in this case removal of an NH 2 group) can facilitate binding of Ru II dppz complexes and hence influence any sensitised reactions occurring at these sites. No similar enhancement of photooxidation on binding to I9 is found for the delta enantiomer.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Chemistry, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AD, UK.


Macromolecules

Find similar nucleic acids by:  Sequence   |   3D Structure  

Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains LengthOrganismImage
DNA (5'-D(*(THM)P*TP*GP*GP*CP*GP*CP*CP*AP*A)-3')10synthetic construct
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 2 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
RKL
Query on RKL

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A]Ru(tap)2(dppz) complex
C38 H22 N12 Ru
PIKVAZQLFXBUSD-UHFFFAOYSA-N
BA
Query on BA

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
C [auth A]BARIUM ION
Ba
XDFCIPNJCBUZJN-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.39 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.185 
  • R-Value Work: 0.166 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.167 
  • Space Group: P 43 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 42.38α = 90
b = 42.38β = 90
c = 39.3γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
xia2data reduction
XDSdata reduction
SHELXphasing
XSCALEdata scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilUnited KingdomBB/K019279/1
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilUnited KingdomBB/M004635/1

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2016-11-23
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2017-07-19
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2017-08-09
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2017-08-30
    Changes: Author supporting evidence, Derived calculations